|
06-06-2005, 06:05 PM | #21 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
|
|
06-06-2005, 06:06 PM | #22 | |
Dragon
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,574
|
Quote:
line is one thing, but can it be possible that all the arowanas used in the broodstock came from just one breeding pair? Thats why the f3/4/5 share a common unique characteristic? it's probably not the case, IMO. |
|
06-06-2005, 06:07 PM | #23 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
er.....
my two cents worth, I think when you cross a grade 1 red with a XB, you will get a range of colouration of F1 ranging from red to "TY" to gold, this is mendelian genetics, when you cross the F1 TY with F1 TY, you will get either red or gold (going back to the F0) when you cross F1 TY with F0, you get the traits of the particular F1 TY brooder that you have used (backcrossing) when you cross F1 TY with a red(not from the F0 stock), you will get almost clean batches of TY with colouration of TY + more red traits. as for the HBRTG, I think farmers breed them because of a few reasons: 1. RTG are more prolific breeders in our climate and conditions 2. the "XB" used in these breeding "programs" are either "lousy" ( which might also means hybrids) XB that did not cross, or it has very light colouration, or undesirable traits(short finnage, PLJ, short head)...... Totally agree with you that it has not economical sense to breed these....BUT...different breeders have different mind set... Quote:
|
|
06-06-2005, 06:11 PM | #24 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
not exactly. the line of distinction is more prominent in golds than reds, if we're talking about arowanas RTG and upwards. like you said the offsprings of different pairings of even pure strain spawns would give different results, how is it that the certain characteristics of certain farm's products end up looking similar to each other, yet unique to other farms? They can't be consistantly from the same parents ma... even guppies can't spawn that fast and frequently.
yes of course they do not breed constantly from the same parents? IMO no farm constantly have all their RTGs with yellowish tail, unless u have pics to prove me wrong line is one thing, but can it be possible that all the arowanas used in the broodstock came from just one breeding pair? Thats why the f3/4/5 share a common unique characteristic? it's probably not the case, IMO F3/4/5 could share a common characteristic due to the fact that they are inbred, and they could be backbred with the F1, so basically trying to keep the characteristics as simillar as possible . |
06-06-2005, 06:12 PM | #25 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
does it means that....the farm owner from 1 look they can distinguish its they farm fish a not? |
|
06-06-2005, 06:13 PM | #26 | |
Dragon
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,574
|
Quote:
The HBRTG theory may have originated from another farm and then weaved into a fairytale, or it may have happened sometime ago, but then I do believe most of the HBRTGs in the market are not of RTGxXB descendence, but still, they may or may not be linebred with RTGxRTGs. |
|
06-06-2005, 06:14 PM | #27 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
|
|
06-06-2005, 06:17 PM | #28 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
and they got import fish from other places too leh... |
|
06-06-2005, 06:18 PM | #29 | |
Barney
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,118
|
Quote:
__________________
Retired. Offline. For my friends only. Need help call me directly. |
|
06-06-2005, 06:19 PM | #30 | |
Dragon
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,574
|
Quote:
Agree with the second paragraph but it doesn't shed light on the threadstarter's topic. So are we trying to try to conclude if HBRTGs are pure strains or whether the HBRTGs are in fact RTGxXB descendants? |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|