Arofanatics Fish Talk Forums  

Go Back   Arofanatics Fish Talk Forums > The Guildhouse > Chatterbox > Singapore Politics

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 16-02-2017, 07:37 PM   #111
hkh
Arofanatic
 
hkh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 113
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by streetsmart73 View Post
he is human he is God he is also the devil

Canto slang
自欺欺人........and the Dynasty will fall.........
hkh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-02-2017, 03:09 PM   #112
Auratus
Arofanatic
 
Auratus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 134
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by streetsmart73 View Post
he is human he is God he is also the devil

Canto slang
I am not sure about the human and god.
Auratus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-02-2017, 05:06 PM   #113
streetsmart73

Hi there !!! 123
 
streetsmart73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,895
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Auratus View Post
I am not sure about the human and god.
during the Chinese 7th moon, just don't look at the local news lor
streetsmart73 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-02-2017, 08:24 PM   #114
manakoleng
Arofanatic
 
manakoleng's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 111
Default

With this rule constitutionalized, It is a mockery to our pledge that says, "... regardless of race, language or religion. To build a democratic society, based on justice and equality...". Henceforth we will be constantly reminded that no matter how many years of nation building we go through, there's always a great racial divide that we can't cross. How do we identify ourselves as 1 nation and 1 Singaporean, if the law implies we are not?

Sent from my HTC_M10h using Tapatalk
manakoleng is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-02-2017, 04:44 PM   #115
globalcookie
Dragon
 
globalcookie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,446
Default

That is the reason why I don't recite the pledge since school days. At most pretend by mumbling don't know what to show lips are moving during NS.

Simi regardless. BS! We are a racist society beginning from where else
globalcookie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2017, 10:15 AM   #116
globalcookie
Dragon
 
globalcookie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,446
Default

SingaporeTan Cheng Bock legal challenge: High Court likely to be mindful of Sep Presidential Election, experts say

By*Monica Kotwani*@MKotwaniCNA

09 May 2017 09:55PM*(Updated:*09 May 2017 10:00PM)

Share this content

SINGAPORE: Constitutional experts and lawyers Channel NewsAsia spoke with said it is unlikely that the recent High Court application by former presidential candidate, Dr Tan Cheng Bock will delay the Presidential Election, due to be held in September.

Following amendments to the Constitution last year, the next election will be reserved for candidates from the Malay community.

On Monday (May 8) Dr Tan announced in a Facebook post that he had filed an application with the High Court last week. He said he is seeking to determine if Section 22 of the Presidential Elections (Amendment) Act - which triggers a reserved election by counting former President Wee Kim Wee as the first elected President - is in line with the Constitution.

Dr Tan said he had filed the application after seeking the legal advice of Queen’s Counsel David Pannick. He said he asked Lord Pannick if the Attorney-General (AG) had correctly advised the Government to specify President Wee’s term as the first to be counted for the reserved election, on the basis that he was the first President to exercise elected powers.

Dr Tan has previously stated his belief that the trigger for a reserved election should start with former President Ong Teng Cheong. In the Facebook post, Dr Tan said Lord Pannick disagreed with the AG’s advice, which prompted Dr Tan to file the application before the High Court. A pre-trial conference (PTC) has been fixed for May 22.*

Advertisement

Law professor at Singapore Management University, Eugene Tan, said that as the courts do not prejudge, one should not read too much into the merits of the case merely by the court's acceptance of the application.*

“An application may be rejected if the required particulars are incomplete or requirements under the Rules of Court have not been complied with. The acceptance of the application indicates that the application is in order,” Assoc Prof Tan said.

Senior Counsel N Sreenivasan added the PTC is an administrative process where issues are fleshed out and where timelines for the application are discussed. Mr Sreenivasan, who is also managing director of law firm Straits Law said the timeline for subsequent proceedings will become clearer after the PTC. But he said the court would be mindful of urgent deadlines.

"Where the court’s determination will have an impact on a forthcoming event or parties rights, the court would normally fix an earlier hearing date to accommodate such matters," he said.*

Assoc Prof Tan agreed, saying the election formalities will begin in June, when presidential hopefuls can start applying for the certificates of eligibility and community certificates. But he said the critical point of the election process is when the writ is issued, probably in late August. Assoc Prof Tan said the court will take this into account in managing this case.*

“I believe the court will move resolutely and expeditiously so that the election will not be detrimentally affected by the unresolved issue as to whether it (the provision in question) is constitutional or not,” he said.

But adjunct law professor at the National University of Singapore, Kevin Tan, said the timeline could be tight, especially if there are appeals made in between.

“Let’s say Dr Tan Cheng Bock loses the case and says ‘I want to appeal’ but no leave of appeal is given then there may be an appeal on the no leave matter. That is where the time crunch will be,” he said.

Assoc Prof Tan added that for Dr Tan to succeed, he would have to show that the advice to the Government by the Attorney-General was “fundamentally flawed”. “In general, courts refrain from reviewing the exercise of political judgment by Parliament or the Cabinet,” he said.

“The AG will robustly explain and justify the legal basis for starting the count from President Wee, including the deeming provision in Article 163(1) of the Singapore Constitution,” he said.

The provision states that although not elected into office by Singaporean voters in a Presidential Election,*the person holding the office of President just before Nov 30, 1991 will exercise, perform and discharge all the functions and duties conferred upon the office of the Elected President as if he had been so elected.*

Dr Wee was President when the provision came into effect as part of the legislation for the Elected Presidency.

Source: CNA/mo
Read more at http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/...indful-8832032
globalcookie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2017, 01:27 PM   #117
Robson
Arofanatic
 
Robson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 441
Default

Reading 2nd last para, tcb cannot win. Agc can't be that bad.
Robson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2017, 02:27 PM   #118
millenium
Senior Dragon
 
millenium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,495
Default

He will tio play until he is so old that he can no longer think properly.
millenium is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2017, 06:42 PM   #119
Kohaku
Dragon
 
Kohaku's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 2,736
Default

Dun look down on tcb. Seem like he has strong backings from his friends. If normal ppl, like us, won't even know we can challenge constitution like this. Surely he has strong advice before he make this move.

However, saying this, it would also means pay & pay may know how to counter if this should happens. Not forgetting they also have lawyers and advisors in their group to seek advice.

This outcome would be interesting to see and follow. Good luck to TCB as the news article may have already predict the outcome unless there is a twist.
Kohaku is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2017, 06:51 PM   #120
calvin ong
Dragon
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 567
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kohaku View Post

This outcome would be interesting to see and follow. Good luck to TCB as the news article may have already predict the outcome unless there is a twist.
Nothing interesting in the outcome.
Confirm and chop TCB will lose.
Never mind what Queen Counsel, what Lord Pannick
Even if you get the Privy Council Judge, still lose

Even if Wee Kim Wee is not elected, so what ?
He will still be considered as " Elected "

TCB will still not be able to stand as a candidate.

Once upon a time, JB Jeyaretnam appeal all the way to London's Privy Council after he lost each and every single one of the case hearings in Singapore.
Finally he won his case in London's courts.

Guess what ? Singapore dun recognise the judgement, refused to heed the verdict and subsequently abolished London's Privy Council as Singapore's highest court of appeal.
calvin ong is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +9. The time now is 08:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright © 2000-2008 Arofanatics.com (Since 30th August 2000)