|
17-02-2010, 08:58 PM | #11 |
Dragon
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 662
|
I no expert but just wondering is it possible for the following reasons ?? :
Faster flowrate is good for mechanical filtration - to remove solid waste/unsightful particles; Slower flowrate is better for bio-filtration - to provide adequate time for the BBs to do the jobs. If so, the best of all is to have a system with control of flow for bio or mech filtration. |
17-02-2010, 10:00 PM | #12 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
Hey stoner interesting useful info.meaning the BB in the biohomme works more efficiently when the flow rate is slow? anyone can confirm? |
|
17-02-2010, 10:52 PM | #13 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
i am using 4000l/h for my 5ft OHF, i feel its pretty decent thou the overturn rate is over what many bros suggested. also think about the FlowRate which it has to bring up to the tank for those with sump and shorter distance for those bros with OHF... so far there has been no spikes in all my NH...blahblah readings... very stable all along unless i add a new fish/water. =) but it clears up very fast.
|
18-02-2010, 01:32 AM | #14 |
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 57,626
|
In short, fast flowrate good for mechincal filtration while slow flowrate is good for biological filtration. That's one reason why I got slower rate flow in my house filtration system and yes... the dirt is unsightly in there and need much longer time for them to be "suck" away.
|
18-02-2010, 03:39 AM | #15 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
The rise in total ammonia during heavy feeding is called transient ammonia spike. This can be reduced by spreading the feeding....Instead of 1 heavy feeding per day, change to 3 feeding instead. |
|
18-02-2010, 04:25 AM | #16 | |
Dragon
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,938
|
Quote:
Current 6 x 2.5 x 2.5ft is supported via a small 3 x 2 x 1.5ft sump. A new 5 x 2 x 2ft sump is on the way... Thanks for your advise... |
|
18-02-2010, 12:05 PM | #17 |
Dragon
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,451
|
so bro Mod atom, can let us know why the sump pump is 4X the tank volume? really interested to know Is it a bad idea to have 10X?
|
18-02-2010, 12:12 PM | #18 |
Dragon
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,938
|
|
18-02-2010, 12:42 PM | #19 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
An exaggerated example: The water speeding pass a chamber containing CR at 1000 l/hr, can remove 4 mg/l of ammonia. When the velocity increases to 2000 l/hr, the chamber can remove 2 mg/l of ammonia. To compensate for the losses, the water has to pass 2 chambers in order to remove 4 mg/l of ammonia. |
|
18-02-2010, 01:00 PM | #20 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I use a x12 flowrate with a 1000/hr pump using OHF and a 1300/hr canister for my 3 feet tank. Its an overkill but it keeps the water clean and my puffer seems to be okay with it
Im thinking of just getting one good canister like FX5 instead of running two at the same time |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests) | |
|
|