|
27-02-2014, 08:25 PM | #11 |
Dragon
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,038
|
|
27-02-2014, 08:59 PM | #12 |
Endangered Dragon
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 96,529
|
Huat arrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr .. give old man somthing ,.,,,,,,,,, take back 500% for us ,........... huatarrrrrrrrrrrrrr
抛砖引玉 Last edited by KAO LUO; 27-02-2014 at 09:01 PM. |
27-02-2014, 09:08 PM | #13 | |
Dragon
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,995
|
Quote:
increase due to higher cost is inevitable.... I've no issue with them increasing the TC as this is a pass-on cost, TC cannot subside the service, people work inside, contractors servicing the contract will be benefited......BUT...why TC need to keep the reserve for investment? They should be a Zero base organisation or the most few mths up to 1 yr running cost reserve!!! |
|
27-02-2014, 09:12 PM | #14 | |
Endangered Dragon
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 96,529
|
Quote:
hahahahahah use our reserve to invest,, .. all our govt $$$$ face la .// help abit .......... take us 500times back |
|
27-02-2014, 09:25 PM | #15 |
Arofanatic
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 144
|
read oso stomach got fire
every tender go for lowest quote and still say its rising cost |
27-02-2014, 09:30 PM | #16 |
Arofanatic
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 113
|
They invest......is to give us a better tomorrow.......but we are even struggling to live today......so who needs tomorrow ??
|
27-02-2014, 10:20 PM | #17 |
Dragon
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 954
|
pcb the first para of the tc letter see already blood boil.....should ask them back - "how much of the tc funds collected from us, did you squandered in the mini bonds"
|
27-02-2014, 10:22 PM | #18 |
Dragon
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,995
|
|
27-02-2014, 10:33 PM | #19 |
Dragon
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,020
|
|
27-02-2014, 11:16 PM | #20 |
Arofanatic
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 119
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|