|
08-09-2009, 01:49 AM | #11 |
Dragon
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,264
|
answer is obvious ---first piece
why? because for me,a standard/classic pdr,a 321 is a must.and starting from the ending 1 formation,must hv a minimum full ring uninterrupted symtrical spots. if you look at the second piece,that ring is interrupted with uneven spotting. however both are already top quality pdr lah,since hv to pick only one,then hv to go into detail why second piece loss some mark.heehee |
08-09-2009, 01:52 AM | #12 | |
Dragon
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 651
|
Quote:
|
|
08-09-2009, 02:26 AM | #13 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
1st piece! Love the symmetry
|
08-09-2009, 09:12 AM | #14 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Base on the pixs only without the knowledge of the parents I would choose the second
pc.Chances of developing into an island is higher I think. |
08-09-2009, 09:59 AM | #15 |
Dragon
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 692
|
i will go for the second. bigger spots with island ellipse potential. if its not bd parents, look like bd wont get you far...like a fake frank muller watch. Rather that the genuine tag heuer than a fake frank.
|
08-09-2009, 10:38 AM | #16 |
Dragon
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 886
|
2nd piece for sure.
|
08-09-2009, 10:49 AM | #17 |
Dragon
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,982
|
I will still choose the 1st pc..as the spots are more evenly spotted..2nd pc might hv some small spots potential to develop with island but the spots to me are messy
|
08-09-2009, 10:53 AM | #18 |
Dragon
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 835
|
Both pcs are gd to me lor. Think u can afford both lah, so wat the headache about man?
|
08-09-2009, 10:58 AM | #19 |
Dragon
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,983
|
|
08-09-2009, 11:26 AM | #20 |
Dragon
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,264
|
if is a pair or both females,can tapao both.
but if both males,....i skip paisei |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|