Bukit Batok By-Election

[millenium]

Originally Posted by amkbettafan

Yesterday Sunday Times have a 2 page article on women who cheats on their husband.

Interesting to note, when cheat with partner of the same sex, the divorce paper is stated "unreasonable behavior".

One lady even cheated the husband 4 times, before he called it a day.

Lesbian? The wife is bi?

[amkbettafan]

Originally Posted by millenium

Lesbian? The wife is bi?

Can hapen to both male or female.

Husband is gay or bi.

Wife is lesbian or bi.

Usually, the cheating party will give up child custody for such case. Really, WTF, situation.

[hkh]

Originally Posted by amkbettafan

One lady even cheated the husband 4 times, before he called it a day.

So David might not be Wendy's first cheat after all...........

[jcchia]

Originally Posted by ymmij

A Loser trying to tell more lies ....................

[Ong88]

Originally Posted by jcchia

A Loser trying to tell more lies ....................

Sue lah if really untruths and lies.

Tok kok on social media

[richardg]

Originally Posted by jcchia

A Loser trying to tell more lies ....................

sounds reasonable to me

[lenghan]

Originally Posted by richardg

sounds reasonable to me

Unfortunately more of defending himself rather than the Party he represents

[stargazer]

I think he should just move on. If as he said he will not give up Bukit Batok, then next election comes fight again lor.

[amkbettafan]

Originally Posted by lenghan

Unfortunately more of defending himself rather than the Party he represents

He attempt to set e record straight in order to clear his name and not let this saga hanging over him forever.

If the Chiams do not agree on CSJ timeline and facts (claim from courts paper), they should come out and state their facts as well.

I am all for burying the hatchet among oppositions and fight the common enemy.

Sueing each other is counter productive, that will make MIW job even easier HaHa

[richardg]

Originally Posted by lenghan

Unfortunately more of defending himself rather than the Party he represents

unfortunate?
he was the one being attacked ma, not the party per se
dont think logical for him to be defending party in this case