Arofanatics Fish Talk Forums  

Go Back   Arofanatics Fish Talk Forums > The Guildhouse > Chatterbox > Singapore Politics

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-07-2017, 11:33 PM   #461
stargazer
Dragon
 
stargazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 877
Default

If you dislike LHL or have many grievances on how the garmen is being run on many things, likely is you may be bias against them even though some of the facts are there.

And why LHY and LWL now agree to settle the saga privately? More likely is they realise the damage being done to SG and we may well become a laughing stock. Think not so much as whether they are right or LHL is right.

Question is: why in first place bring up the matter publicly?

Quote:
Originally Posted by elimmel View Post
Actually why LHY and LWL so adamant that the house has to be demolished? Even if it's the real wish of LKY, it is still subject to the Preservation of Monuments Act?
Abuse of power by LHL by letting the demolition decision be reviewed by the committee?

Let's hope this dispute, if really just because of the house demolition issue, can be resolved privately within the Lee family. It's never nice to see any family however rich and powerful, to be torn apart because of internal rife.
Let the government turn their attention back to national issues pls
Agree with you bro. Good to see your comments.
stargazer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2017, 11:36 PM   #462
lenghan
Arofanatic
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 71
Default LHL's reply to the "truce"

SINGAPORE — Responding to his siblings' latest joint statement, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said on Thursday evening (July 6) that he shared their wish
"not to carry on the dispute in public and to manage the disagreement in private".
"That is exactly what I have been trying to do," he said.
Noting that his siblings had repeated their previous allegations against him in their latest statement, he added:
"I have already refuted these and stand by what I have said."

PM Lee also revealed that their initial offer of a truce came with "improper and irresponsible" terms that he could not agree to.

Mr Lee Hsien Yang and Dr Lee Wei Ling had wanted PM Lee to call off his Ministerial Statement and the debate in Parliament,
disband the Ministerial Committee tasked to look into options for 38 Oxley Road, and not respond to their accusations.

Earlier on Thursday, PM Lee’s siblings said — in making another ceasefire offer that came with certain conditions —
that they had previously reached out to the Prime Minister,
soon after they issued their first joint statement on June 14 which triggered the public spat over their family home.
But their attempt at reconciliation was rebuffed, they said.
They added that they will, for now, “cease presenting further evidence on social media”,
provided that they and their father’s wishes are “not attacked or misrepresented”.
They also said they welcomed PM Lee’s offer to manage their disagreement privately.

In a separate statement, Deputy Prime Minister Teo Chee Hean said he regarded the proclamation by Mr Lee Hsien Yang and Dr Lee Wei Ling
that they welcome PM Lee's desire to settle the dispute in private as a positive development, "like most Singaporeans".
"With this development, I hope that we can all work together and focus our energy on taking Singapore forward," he said.

Mr Teo noted that PM Lee's siblings also repeated their allegations against the Ministerial Committee, public agencies and public officers,
but the Government "has already responded comprehensively to all of them in Parliament".
lenghan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2017, 11:37 PM   #463
foxwagon
Dragon
 
foxwagon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,181
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by elimmel View Post
Actually why LHY and LWL so adamant that the house has to be demolished?
They stated that they didn't want their father (him too) to be idolised like a cult, & their mother wouldn't like to have strangers going inside the house, if the house were to be preserved.
foxwagon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2017, 12:18 AM   #464
loveikan
Arofanatic
 
loveikan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 384
Default

This is MP who dare to speak up.

http://mothership.sg/2017/07/ex-ang-...emolish-house/

Ex-Ang Mo Kio MP Inderjit Singh: Lee Wei Ling moves out of 38 Oxley Road now & demolish house
Decide on matter now, not later.
loveikan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2017, 12:22 AM   #465
lenghan
Arofanatic
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 71
Default

Both sides seems bend on insisting they are right.
Neither sides look like they would give way or compromise by the manner the offer and acceptance were drafted.
So, until they finally decided to sit down and discuss (which I believe is gonna be a long way off), this saga ain't over.
Cos in the "acceptance" of the offer, LHL still maintain his stand about the demolition and the will.....which contradicts the offer conditions stipulated by the siblings.
So.....Part II continues........
lenghan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2017, 01:39 AM   #466
KeeHuat
Dragon
 
KeeHuat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,357
Default

The reason LHY and LWL exposed everything in public is likely because they had no other avenue left to follow through with the wishes of LKY to demolish the house
with the organs of state being used against them as they stated.

When LKY was still alive, all 3 Lees controlled themselves. When he was gone, all hell broke loose.

By keep on going on about the will, isn't it implying that LKY didn't know what he was signing.

The reason given for not contesting the probate in court by LHL is flimsy.

Last edited by KeeHuat; 07-07-2017 at 01:43 AM.
KeeHuat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2017, 02:12 AM   #467
byfun
Arofanatic
 
byfun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 128
Default

The proper way is for NHB and URA to consider conservation status like all other building of historical value in Singapore. But having conservation status doesnt mean it is open for public visit.

The house will be still privately owned and its just like any other house.

That why u see in LKY will he also state that if the house is not being demolished due to government, he does not wish it being open to public. Meaning he hope gov dont acquire the house and convert it to be a museum. All these he know is within the power of the gov, the same law he created haunting him.
byfun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2017, 09:08 AM   #468
stargazer
Dragon
 
stargazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 877
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KeeHuat View Post
The reason LHY and LWL exposed everything in public is likely because they had no other avenue left to follow through with the wishes of LKY to demolish the house
with the organs of state being used against them as they stated.
By exposing that in public, what do they gained?

I am not on the side of LHL nor LHY or LWL. Just feel it is folly to expose it for all to see.
stargazer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2017, 09:12 AM   #469
stargazer
Dragon
 
stargazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 877
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by loveikan View Post
This is MP who dare to speak up.

http://mothership.sg/2017/07/ex-ang-...emolish-house/

Ex-Ang Mo Kio MP Inderjit Singh: Lee Wei Ling moves out of 38 Oxley Road now & demolish house
Decide on matter now, not later.
Spot on. Move out now if really so keen to see it demolish
stargazer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2017, 09:40 AM   #470
hkh
Arofanatic
 
hkh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 113
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stargazer View Post
Spot on. Move out now if really so keen to see it demolish
But will this ever happen ??
hkh is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +9. The time now is 08:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright © 2000-2008 Arofanatics.com (Since 30th August 2000)